From spreadsheet apps to production-grade software. What decides it: whether the data outgrows a spreadsheet. The full comparison is below.
Take a field-service app where technicians log jobs against a spreadsheet the office already maintains. Glide is the right answer to that question and will be finished before Appifex has generated anything: it points straight at the sheet and produces a usable app. It becomes the wrong answer when the data outgrows a spreadsheet, when the app needs to work offline as a real installed app rather than a web view, or when custom server-side logic appears. Appifex starts from a PostgreSQL schema and a Python backend, which is more setup for the simple case and the only workable answer for the complex one.
Free tier: 2 team members, 10 projects, integrations and AI features, with limited credits and no published apps.
Paid: Basic is $25/month; Plus $50; Pro $125.
Publishing starts at Basic, which allows 2 published apps and 1 enabled workflow. Published-app count, not build volume, is what pushes you up the tiers.
Free is 1,000 credits a month, card-free; Pro $20/month for 5,000, which is also where native Swift builds and managed hosting start; Max $200/month for 100,000. Full breakdown.
Glide pricing read from Glide pricing on , the same day as every other claim on this page. Vendors change prices; check the source before deciding.
Choose Appifex if your data has outgrown a spreadsheet and needs a real relational schema, or you need a native app rather than something spreadsheet-shaped.
Choose Glide if your data already lives in a spreadsheet and you need a simple internal app on top of it quickly.
For different things. Glide is faster to a working app when the data already lives in a spreadsheet, and for a simple internal tool that is the whole job. Appifex is the better answer when the app outgrows a spreadsheet, needs server-side logic, or needs to be a real installed app rather than a web view — because it starts from a PostgreSQL schema and a Python backend rather than a sheet. More setup for the simple case; the only workable one for the complex case.
No. Glide creates web-based apps that can be pinned to the home screen but are not native. Appifex generates true React Native apps deployable to the App Store and Google Play.
See how Appifex compares to Glide — build your first app in minutes.
One caveat we hold ourselves to, because this page holds others to it. Connect your GitHub and Expo accounts and almost all of this is yours outright. Skip that step and several pieces stay ours, so it is worth saying which.
Provisioned rather than generated: your database is PostgreSQL on Neon, and authentication — when you enable it — is Neon Auth. The schema and the migrations live in your repository, so the database moves to any Postgres by changing a connection string. Neon Auth does not; swapping it means replacing an auth provider, which is a day of work rather than a rewrite.
Ours until you connect an account: without GitHub repo scope the repository is created in Appifex's organisation rather than yours, and without a connected Expo account TestFlight builds ship under ours. Both are one connection away from being yours, and the ownership claims on this page assume you have made it.
A platform component in mobile apps: generated React Native projects contain a _system/ folder — error handling, Sentry reporting and a floating Appifex button — that the agent will decline to remove on request. It is ordinary TypeScript in your repository and you can delete it yourself after cloning, but while you are working inside Appifex it is not optional, and calling that "no shim to work around" would be too generous.
This comparison is published by Appifex, one of the two products in it. Treat the recommendation accordingly and check the claims. Capability claims were checked against Glide documentation, and pricing against Glide pricing— neither page reproduces the other's full pricing, so check it there — both last verified on . Both products change often — check the current terms before deciding.